• Home
  • About
    • About Competitive Futures
    • About Eric Garland
    • News
  • Case studies
    • Competitive strategy
    • Economic development
    • Opportunity assessment
  • Services
    • Research
      • Technology foresight
      • Future customer profiles
      • Competitor positioning
      • Investment due diligence
    • Training
      • Future Intelligence course
      • Real Forecasting
  • Media
    • Best practice reports
    • Books by Eric Garland
    • Articles by Eric Garland
    • Podcast episodes
    • STEEP Reports
    • Presentations
  • Blog
  • Contact

Posts Tagged ‘macroeconomics’

Economics dorkfight: Mankiw versus Krugman BLOODMATCH

Wednesday, 04 March 2009 16:34 Written by Eric Garland 2 Comments

OK, that title is just fun to write.

The econo-blogo-sphere has been lit up between two macroeconomic heavyweights arguing about the forecasts for GDP growth. To catch you up:

  • The president’s Council of Economic Advisors projects substantial GDP growth to follow the contraction, based on the logical that the deeper the recession, the more significant the recovery – as much as 15% GDP growth by 2013.
  • Gregory Mankiw expresses doubt with this view – mostly because we don’t understand when the economy will bottom out. Also, something about unit root hypothesis is discussed, but I am not smart enough to figure out what it means.
  • Paul Krugman suggests that the unit root hypothesis may be the root of some kind of evil, and retorts with Okun’s Law, a devastating witty retort involving the relationship between GDP and unemployment and Mankiw’s mother.
  • Mankiw wants to bet Krugman some of his Nobel prize earnings as well as a night with Krugman’s mom that real GDP of 2013 will not be 15.6% higher than 2008 real GDP

I’m siding with Mankiw on this one. Not that I have a single intelligent thing to add regarding the relative predictive capability of Okun’s Law – I’m afraid I am working just with vague numbers and common sense.

As I have pointed out numberous times in this space over the last several weeks, our economic growth has been juiced entirely by debt in the last few years – a situation without precedent in the modern history of macroeconomic theory. Perhaps if this recession/depression was simply part of the natural business cycle, I would trust in the idea that the temporary unemployment would ultimately lead to pent-up demand, lots of cheap assets and talent, and ultimately a mid-term boost in economic productivity.

Here, we won’t allow assets to collapse in price or let the institutions fail, because to do so would supposedly result in chaos too great for the social fotomortalkombat4fabric to withstand. We’re in debt as people, companies, and governments. As such, the GDP we are bleeding off is a correction back to true productivity gains. But first, the pain.

I would be very nervous to suggest to our clients that GDP would be bounding up 15.8% in the next few years just because it’s wretched now.

Mankiw WINS.

Are you saving money? YOU COULD BE WRECKING THE ECONOMY!

Tuesday, 03 February 2009 10:05 Written by Eric Garland 0 Comments

Yesterday, the Washington Post Express featured a story with an original angle. According to the paper (not an editorial, reported as news) Americans anxious over economic turbulence are starting to save their money for a time without healthcare, food, and other luxuries. The bad news is, this may defeat the purpose of the stimulus bill, to get people to SPEND SPEND SPEND, thus Americans will be ironically wrecking the economy through their careless “saving.”

Let me get this straight: our growth-at-all-costs economy has hit a ditch after Americans began purchasing homes they couldn’t afford and running up massive debt. But the worst thing would be to slow down and reconsider our habits, and live within our means?

I can’t find the link to this story. That’s probably for the best.

Real GDP and the crazy swings in the price of oil

Thursday, 22 January 2009 14:16 Written by Eric Garland 0 Comments

A retweet (if you will) from futurist Glen Hiemstra, I highly recommend this terrific analysis of why oil prices are so low, and what you can expect them to do given the macro-economic situation – courtesy of Gail the Actuary.

This is the kind of economic data we need to see more of – not housing starts, not sales of Korean-made televisions, not fake consumer spending juiced-up by fake home equity loans, but our real situation. And according to this, we haven’t made real economic progress in quite some time.

2009 is the year we start dealing with the real future, and not what we prefer to believe.

About the blog

This is the official trend blog of Competitive Futures, a management consultancy that provides trend research and analysis for business and government around the world. Here, we update you on interesting trends we see as part of our work for our clients.


For managing partner Eric Garland's new author and speaker blog, please consult and bookmark http://www.ericgarland.co

Get trend updates sent to your mailbox

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Sign up for the CompFutures Trend Report

Trends we’re tracking

Tags

agriculture analysis bailout bailouts banking banks business development business models California China competitive intelligence debt disruption Economic Development Economics economy education Energy Entrepreneurialism Facebook finance financial crisis forecasting forecasts foresight future Futurism Greece healthcare intelligence leadership Media mergers mindsets music oil petroleum psychology publishing Retail scenarios social media social networks strategy urbanization
Podcast powered by podPress v8.8.10.12