• Home
  • About
    • About Competitive Futures
    • About Eric Garland
    • News
  • Case studies
    • Competitive strategy
    • Economic development
    • Opportunity assessment
  • Services
    • Research
      • Technology foresight
      • Future customer profiles
      • Competitor positioning
      • Investment due diligence
    • Training
      • Future Intelligence course
      • Real Forecasting
  • Media
    • Best practice reports
    • Books by Eric Garland
    • Articles by Eric Garland
    • Podcast episodes
    • STEEP Reports
    • Presentations
  • Blog
  • Contact

Category: finance

Forty years of international currency away from the gold standard

Tuesday, 16 August 2011 15:16 Written by Eric Garland 0 Comments

The postmodernization of global economics started in earnest forty years ago when Richard Nixon announced the end of the gold standard, nominally to protect American economic interests. It behooves us to go back and listen to the man’s statements regarding the decision. Note the dark tone delivered toward “international financial speculators,” a group that is held in disrepute compared with the “working man” and “savers” who are presented as the drivers of real prosperity.

How interesting in retrospect that Nixon’s chief rationalization for creating a fiat currency is that if you are in the market for foreign cars or exotic trips, you may feel the pinch of devaluation, but for all you Americans who want to buy AMERICAN goods, your dollar will be worth just as much.

First, let us compare the long-term suspension of the convertability of the U.S. Dollar directly into gold:

Valuation of the dollar versus an ounce of gold

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It would seem that the value of gold has done quiet well against the U.S. Dollar since this decision. Or is it that the U.S. Dollar has lost its value? Eye of the holder, we suppose.

Nixon pointed out that as long as you only bought American goods, this would not be a big deal at all – your purchasing power would stay exactly the same.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I guess somewhere between Honda, Toyota, Hyundai, and Volkswagen cars, Samsung televisions, LG appliances, textiles, home goods, and chopsticks, Americans have been buying billions in foreign goods, leaving the United States with a trade balance that has never been equalized. Nixon loses some futurist points right there.

The economic prosperity of the United States has been more than enough to equal the loss of purchasing power of the dollar, correct?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actually, it seems more that household debt, both as credit cards and student loan debt, have been making up the losses since the unshackling of the U.S. dollar from the Bretton Woods agreement.

Whether you take these trends to be correlation or causation, the last forty years of economics have been an experiment with a new international financial regime. Almost every currency on Earth is run by diktat, which means “it’s worth what we say it’s worth.” The world’s economic system becomes ever more complex as new countries trade in earnest, but there is no longer a limiting factor, i.e. the limited availability of reserve goal, to which to tether the system. The world system now requires a group of like-minded global financial engineers to keep fiscal infrastructure running through policies that beg and pray for status quo stability, rather than a group of reasonably unbiased referees who set a few rules and let the game play out as it may. This is where the intellectual work of Nassim Nicholas Taleb comes into play, posing the question, “Who could possibly possess the wisdom to manage a system of limitless complexity?” Answer: nobody we see in the public sphere today.

Returning to Nixon, he wanted to hamstring the “international financial speculators.” Today, megabanks, hedge funders, traders and George Soros-type financiers enjoy limitless access to Washington policy makers and even get made Treasury Secretary with significant frequency. Nixon wanted to end the crises that enriched financial engineers at the expense of real wealth creators. Hello double digit unemployment and simultaneous record-breaking financier bonus pools. He wanted to protect American purchasing power and promote American-made goods within her borders. We instead see never-ending trade deficits.

Where does monetary policy go from here? If you ask gold bugs, it is right back to some form of gold standard. If you ask central banks, they will tell you we just need one more bailout of some sunburned nation that lost control of its finances, but then we’ll be back to “normal.” If you ask the average working person or job-creating entrepreneur, they will likely look at you blankly, uninterested in the machinations of ultra-high level policymaking.

In any event, the trend lines suggest the end of an era. Step back hundreds of years, and there are no global systems of fiat currency to give us an instructive analogy. We will be creating our future anew.

What do you think? Is it back to precious metals with us? Will the system shatter into competing local currencies? Facebook credits? Giant stone wheels of the Yapman? Leave us your view in the comments section.

Corporate profits: business-as-usual in America, with a twist

Monday, 25 April 2011 10:39 Written by Eric Garland 1 Comment

This chart says some interesting things about the post-2008 business world in America. Specifically, it screams that if you are involved in business, the world probably looks very different than it does if you are a teacher, a carpenter, a senior depending on fixed income, or a new grad looking for work.

Over the past 30 years, there have been ups and downs, but if you are a publicly traded large company, you can definitely expect more than five percent return on your capital, and often you can expect much more than the average investor. But what really interests us is that in the post-2008 world of crazy gloom and doom and bailouts – the profit margins look like we’re in a golden age.

Corporate profit trendsAsk the average American, the consumer on whom this success is supposedly based: Are we in a golden age? Does it feel like we’re in a golden age?

Most systems depend on there being a shared sense of meaning. Post-War American success was shared by a broad range of people on the socio-economic spectrum, many of them recent immigrants. The notion of free markets succeeding over a communist enemy provided a certain cohesion to the narrative of what was happening. Are we getting richer? Well, we have a better system and we’re all prospering.

What does this system say about us? Does it make sense? Does it speak to a variety of people?

Student loans outpace credit cards in the United States

Tuesday, 12 April 2011 10:04 Written by Eric Garland 3 Comments

From the New York Times, college students are graduating with increasing amounts of debt, a sum that totals more than Americans are spending on credit cards for the first time.

American labor policy has been to increase the number of college-educated workers as much as possible since the end of the Second World War. Still, the cost of education has been outpacing wages by a factor of 2.5 since 1980. Given the amount of the cost that is borne by student loans, this number is deceptive as to its real impact. The actual amount of wealth spent on education will also have to include interest payments as well.

We believe that there has been a critical error in policy, such that the American government has equated credentials with critical skills. The American economy could end up with millions of college-graduates with credentials on which they are paying interest, but without the skills required by the emerging world economy.

Wall Street pushes for 100-year bonds – America 2111!

Thursday, 03 February 2011 10:24 Written by Eric Garland 0 Comments

And they say nobody actually thinks about anything beyond the next quarter. Evidently, Wall Street is recommending that governments begin “solving” their debt issues by locking in low interest rates for forty, fifty, maybe one hundred years.

This is interesting. First of all, such a notion will change the financial logic of saving money for the long-term by locking in low interest- very interesting given the number of Boomers who saved for retirement their whole lives.

Otherwise, this gives us a fascinating opening to discuss the very long-term future of America. Let’s get speculating on what America 2111 will look like.

Competitive Futures, Inc now valued at $325 million as per new investment deal

Thursday, 06 January 2011 16:47 Written by Eric Garland 0 Comments

I really wish that the title of the above post wasn’t merely a snarky way to call attention to the fact that with hedge fund investment deals like the ones Twitter and Facebook are touting, we’re back to the good old days of irrational tech exurberance. I suppose if it were true, I wouldn’t be typing but would instead be happily playing my absurdly large collection of vintage Stratocasters and D’angelico New Yorker archtops through my vintage Fender Twin amps in our chateau in the Loire valley.

Guitaristic dreams aside, we seem to be back into an interesting of period that recalls the halcyon days of the Dot Com Bubble 1.0. Back then, the glorious days of new-car-smelling Porsche Boxsters, spiffy leather jackets and brand-new bulky cell phones, you didn’t have to prove any piffling details like how much profit you made in order for your company to be worth bazillions of dollars. You even got to say things like, “We’re the company of the future, although we are still searching for a business model.”

Ah, the good ol’ days of making $75,000 just for knowing how to spell “HTML.”

Facebook’s interesting new “valuation” at $50 billion is raising the eyebrows of a few people who understand the basics of how a company’s value is typically computed. So says William Cohen in the New York Times:

Last August, Facebook was valued at $27 billion and now it’s $50 billion — for a company with a reported $2 billion in revenue and negligible profits. If General Electric, with 2010 revenue of around $150 billion, traded at a similar multiple of revenue, it would be worth $3.75 trillion instead of $200 billion. Facebook is now considered to be worth more than Time Warner, DuPont and Goldman’s rival Morgan Stanley.

Something is definitely up. This is why we were intrigued to discover that there is actually more IPO deal activity now than during the late 90s!


Can I have a Porsche Boxster please?

« Older Entries

About the blog

This is the official trend blog of Competitive Futures, a management consultancy that provides trend research and analysis for business and government around the world. Here, we update you on interesting trends we see as part of our work for our clients.


For managing partner Eric Garland's new author and speaker blog, please consult and bookmark http://www.ericgarland.co

Get trend updates sent to your mailbox

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Sign up for the CompFutures Trend Report

Trends we’re tracking

Tags

agriculture analysis bailout bailouts banking banks business development business models California China competitive intelligence debt disruption Economic Development Economics economy education Energy Entrepreneurialism Facebook finance financial crisis forecasting forecasts foresight future Futurism Greece healthcare intelligence leadership Media mergers mindsets music oil petroleum psychology publishing Retail scenarios social media social networks strategy urbanization
Podcast powered by podPress v8.8.10.12