Rupture! from Michel Cartier
by Eric Garland
I have no idea how I managed to miss this incredible video for so long:
Are You Ready for the 21st Century ? from Michel Cartier on Vimeo.
Funeral fun facts
At the Tastee Diner this morning I had the pleasure of sitting next to a retired man who now makes his extra fun money driving a hearse. Little did I know I would be hearing about strategic trends and secondary implications of the economy’s transition.
Just two days ago, when lecturing at American University, I heard MBA students using the funeral industry as an example of the longer trend in industry consolidation, and simultaneously as an example of profitable opportunities resulting from the global megatrend of aging populations. The professor then spoke up to mention that formal funerals, which regular cost a five-digit sum in America, are sharply down in favor of cremations, around 25% year-over-year.
During breakfast, my new companion informed me that cremations are up, about 25% year over year – and that fewer funeral homes are able to afford their own hearses since their use is becoming comparatively more rare. The cause is assumed to be the lasting effects of the recession.
Twice with the same unusual trend in the same week? Clearly the futurism gods are telling me to look up this development further. And lo, on the Internet you can find voluminous and interesting trends and forecasts for the “celebratory services” industry.
Today, open up the yellow pages, find some unusual businesses and ask yourself what trends they must be experiencing. You will find interesting fodder for your own strategic thinking.
Gregor Macdonald on the future of energy, economics, and society
by Eric Garland
For those of you who know Gregor MacDonald, you know you’re in for a treat with this podcast- a full hour of some of Gregor’s latest forecasts on energy, economics and society, insights you simply won’t get anywhere else.
For those of you who haven’t discovered Gregor yet, he is one of the top energy analysts in the world, and in our minds, one of the top analysts of anything, period.
This podcast covers sweeping ground:
- Why we’re at peak automobiles
- The end of cheap oil
- Coal’s role in the development of the world economy
- The return to human capital and small towns
- Why waterways are the future
- Our current period of “late phase economic decadence
- Why PAKISTAN holds the key to the Copenhagen Protocol
Crazier still, we could have spend ANOTHER hour talking to him and still not exhausted him of insight.
Enjoy.
The 2012 Pelosi GTxi SS/RT Sport Edition – Strategic Scenarios in a Time of Political Intervention
by Eric Garland
If you have a certain nostalgia for 1980s Soviet advertising, or if you’re interested in the current state of the semi-nationalized automobile industry, you’ll get a chuckle out of this “scenario,” an ad for the 2012 Pelosi GTxi SS/RT Sport.
It’s funny, and yes, it contains some fairly partisan political jabs. That kind of material is something I would studiously avoid in a professional context – especially this blog. That said, we’re not in ordinary times. I would say that the current level of government involvement now means that political analysis of industry developments is more important than ever.
As I have said previously, the government is no longer simply regulating industry or financing it through monetary policy – it is now managing companies with the taxpayers as stockholders who have a right to see their investments protected. This will necessarily require an analysis of politicians and their goals. This may mean our competitive analyses will lay bare political feelings in our own organizations. That was the risk of the U.S. Government’s bailout policies, a dramatically-increased politicization of the American – and global – business environment. And here we are.
Competitive intelligence, government acquisitions, and a hallucinogenic future
by Eric Garland
With the bankruptcy of General Motors, our economy has finally hopped over the plane’s wing into the Twilight Zone. Not that this event was surprising to anybody with a cursory interest in money or cars – GM bet its future on the world’s endless thirst for bloated Hummers and Yukons and left quality and disruptive innovation to Asian rivals, all while locked into being America’s largest private provider of healthcare and pensions. You can get six Jack Welches, ten Peter Druckers and those guys who started Google on board and even they aren’t going to figure a way out of that hole. Like any death of a long-sick relative it is still a shock without truly being a surprise. You’ll feel the same way when American healthcare self-destructs and when Social Security cracks in half.
The reason to stockpile peyote and brown acid is not the demise of a for-profit company, which should be a prosaic activity in a capitalist system. You’ll need some strong hallucinogens to deal with how this bankruptcy was done, and what it means. The failure of GM I was expecting; a failure accompanied by an additional thirty to fifty billion of my tax dollars was the pimp slap. Not only is the original “Fortune One” company declaring the death of its business model, now my children and I get to be 60% owners of the company for the foreseeable future. It almost makes me long for the good old days of 2008 when we simply handed bankers hundreds of billions to pay off their bad investments without the need to get seats on the board to protect collective shareholder investments.
The walls began vibrating songs and the chairs began dancing a frentic rumba when a psyche-shaking question occurred to me – How many freaking companies do I own as a taxpayer now? I am a proud owner of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, a lovely deal for the 50/50 partnership in which government covers the “loss” part of the equation and private investors cover the “profits.” I get 80% of AIG, those masters of risk management who set the planet on fire by insuring every transaction on Earth from credit default swaps to Mexican cock fights. I have shored up most of the gargantuan banks on the planet through easy loans so big that our inevitable inflation will soon give Argentina, Brazil and Ukraine a hearty, nostalgic laugh. Now, my government has made me a majority shareholder in a automotive company that will need to atomize the oldest and most-established industrial infrastructure in the world before it could ever hope to compete with the supply chains of Korea, China, Japan and India – though not a word has been written to describe the difficulty of this transition.
As a taxpayer, behold the fantastic portfolio of my future prosperity! I will take this group of investments over any crap that Warren Buffet might cobble together! And that guy Soros will soon be proven to be no match for the investment genius of Obama, Geithner and Bernanke!
The drug trip has barely begun, my friends, and the buzz of bailout is now set to become a thrumming, pulsating multisensory experience as this new market moves ahead into the new physics of crony socialism. There’s no longer any need to believe in gravity, density, or inertia since this new universe is created by executive fiat and is subject to change at any moment. Just consider one question about the moral hazard created in this hallucinatory plane of existence: who is responsible for competitive intelligence for all of these companies that I own?
In order to compete effectively, every company must have a system of intelligence to understand market developments and competitors behavior. This practice varies in sophistication from sending guys to trade shows once in a while to learn stuff, on up to formal intelligence bureaus working in the service of products managers, strategists, and the CEO him/herself. In a modern economy evolving as quickly – and if recent events are any indication, chaotically – making decisions without the benefit of up-to-the-minute data and analysis about the business environment is a sure way to catastrophe. In the world we used to call reality, organizations had a discrete, impermeable layer that separates “us” from “them” and “internal” from “external,” allowing us to look critically at the external world. Intelligence thus permits leaders to understand the future marketplace and take action to insure profitability.
The U.S. Government not only is providing capital to a variety of American industries, it has invested me as an American taxpayer with a majority position in several cases. Moreover, the layer between “us” and “them” is now more permeable than wet Kleenex – since corporations are taxpayers too, Ford’s taxes will make them part owner in GM. Consumers too have multiple interests at stake – buy a new Ford Fusion, and you may watch your investment in GM decline. Buy insurance from a smaller carrier and you may deny AIG, of which you own 80%, of one of the only sources of profit they have to offset their days at the craps table of global finance.
Let’s not forget the government agencies themselves – they are now shaping the market through legislation and regulation, financing the industry through the Treasury’s policy of monitarization, AND acting in the market – ostensibly – to assure the return on the billions of dollars of taxpayer capital they just promised for the coming decades. This is where some peyote may help you squeegee your third eye clean and see into the kaleidoscopic mask of the Bizarro Future. Some major questions loom:
- For America’s neo-mercantile companies, who collects the data in their search for competitive intelligence?
- Who does the analysis? The company that led itself off the cliff, or the federal government bureaucrats who have zero understanding of individual market dynamics?
- To whom do they report first? Cabinet secretaries or CEOs?
- What kind of information is the most important? Rational, measurable data about the objective business environment, or subjective data about political personalities and their connections to top companies? After all, the new shape of the market seems to have more to do with who had Hank Paulson’s cell number in October of 2008 and who had dinner with Geithner while he was at the New York Fed than it does any macroeconomic trends or intellectual property analysis.
I take it back, leave the hard drugs alone. The coming reality will rival anything that distorted neuronal activity might bring. Remember, this is about the moral hazard of the future. It is with the addition of an automotive company to the national portfolio that we finally complicate American capitalism to an unimaginable degree, like trying solve calculus regressions with ten variables. In a business world created through executive order and maintained through fake federal money, all other players in the market – if they are paying attention – should view future market dynamics with the confusion reserved for a fever dream. It makes competitive intelligence extraordinarily necessary, and partially impossible.
Deep Thought: Chrysler
An American auto manufacturer just stated that its plan to get out of bankruptcy is to tap into the awesome organization, logistical, and managerial brilliance of the Italians.
Why you should turn off the television news and think of the market any way you want
by Eric Garland
From the insightful analysts at CNBC:
At 10:14am:”Stocks Slide on Swine-Flu Fears”
At: 11:21am: “Stocks Rebound as Traders Find Flu Trade”
No further comment is required.
The volcanic disruption of local currencies
by Eric Garland
This article from USA TODAY should be on its front page in all red letters.
A small but growing number of cash-strapped communities are printing their own money.Borrowing from a Depression-era idea, they are aiming to help consumers make ends meet and support struggling local businesses.
The systems generally work like this: Businesses and individuals form a network to print currency. Shoppers buy it at a discount — say, 95 cents for $1 value — and spend the full value at stores that accept the currency.
Workers with dwindling wages are paying for groceries, yoga classes and fuel with Detroit Cheers, Ithaca Hours in New York, Plenty in North Carolina or BerkShares in Massachusetts.
It is not possible to overestimate this disruptive nature of this trend.
This has nothing to do with a drycleaner exchanging his services for some computer repair. This is about the nation-state shifting in importance back to the city-state, or at most the regional economy. The economic vitality that normally comes from nations is being choked by the decadence of bankrupt financiers and the inaction of feckless bureaucrats. In response, the people who actually provide the wealth of nations are walking away.
This is a statement to Messieurs Obama, Sarkozy, Brown, Hu et al. that if you can’t make a functioning international currency system, we will not take part. The printing of local currency is the sign of a revolution brewing – a bloodless revolution that is far more radical.
Watch this trend very closely. If it continues, it will change the logic of globalization for the next decade or more.
Jack Welch declares shareholder value “dumbest idea in the world,” employees number one constituency
by Eric Garland
This is perhaps the top entry in the Guinness Record Book of Complete Philosophical Reversals.
Jack Welch, “Neutron Jack,” the great father of steroid-pumped management, “Flourish Elsewhere” human resources, cutting the bottom 10%, and evangelist of shareholder value as a singular strategy, has now declared the whole “money for Wall Street” thing is the “dumbest idea in the world.”
For those of you who have heard the term “shareholder value” abused in every possible context, a phrase used as a placeholder for an actual strategic thought, this reversal is akin to hearing the Surgeon General come out and say, “You know Marlboros and tequila get a bad rep – I think they are part of a healthy breakfast.”
This too is an overcorrection. People who bet their money on the performance of a for-profit enterprise will expect a certain level of return compared to stockpiling gold or letting money sit in a savings bank (assuming you can find a solvent bank these days.) Jack is right, shareholder value is a result and not a strategy – but it’s still a fine goal.
The difference in the next economy will be that half the world won’t be investing through Wall Street for the basic societal functions of assuring a dignified retirement for aging citizens. Once the pensions set to grow at 8% fail (coming soon to an economy near you!) people will get even more hesitant to invest in nameless, shapeless glass and steel buildings. Investing in for-profit companies will return to where it ought to – a risk undertaken by the very professional and very observant.
Will corporations really see employees as their number one constituency, as Jack suggests? He obviously saw value in firing over 110,000 employees in his tenure at General Electric – but it sounds like a nice idea.
The future may look like more of a balance between durable human relationships and the need to keep the doors open by making money.
What is the next form of economic growth?
by Eric Garland
At a luncheon meeting for the International Association of Corporate and Professional Recruiters, we had a stimulating dialogue about future trends and their implications on the next generation of leaders. We discussed the bursting of the current bubble in some depth, leading to one participant asking, “Will we ever see growth again?”
It’s not whether we’ll see growth – it’s whether you’ll recognize it as growth. For more, tune in to today’s episode of the Competitive Futures Podcast:
About Eric Garland
Eric is one of the world's pre-eminent thoughtleaders in forecasting and strategy. He helps leaders of business and government make critical decisions about their futures.Connect with us
Read Future Inc.
Learn
a time-tested, profitable method of discovering business opportunities in the future with Eric Garland's groundbreaking Future Inc: How Businesses Can Anticipate and Profit from What's Next, available at Amazon and fine independent booksellers.
