• Home
  • About
    • About Competitive Futures
    • About Eric Garland
    • News
  • Case studies
    • Competitive strategy
    • Economic development
    • Opportunity assessment
  • Services
    • Research
      • Technology foresight
      • Future customer profiles
      • Competitor positioning
      • Investment due diligence
    • Training
      • Future Intelligence course
      • Real Forecasting
  • Media
    • Best practice reports
    • Books by Eric Garland
    • Articles by Eric Garland
    • Podcast episodes
    • STEEP Reports
    • Presentations
  • Blog
  • Contact

Author Archive

Forty years of international currency away from the gold standard

Tuesday, 16 August 2011 15:16 Written by Eric Garland 0 Comments

The postmodernization of global economics started in earnest forty years ago when Richard Nixon announced the end of the gold standard, nominally to protect American economic interests. It behooves us to go back and listen to the man’s statements regarding the decision. Note the dark tone delivered toward “international financial speculators,” a group that is held in disrepute compared with the “working man” and “savers” who are presented as the drivers of real prosperity.

How interesting in retrospect that Nixon’s chief rationalization for creating a fiat currency is that if you are in the market for foreign cars or exotic trips, you may feel the pinch of devaluation, but for all you Americans who want to buy AMERICAN goods, your dollar will be worth just as much.

First, let us compare the long-term suspension of the convertability of the U.S. Dollar directly into gold:

Valuation of the dollar versus an ounce of gold

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It would seem that the value of gold has done quiet well against the U.S. Dollar since this decision. Or is it that the U.S. Dollar has lost its value? Eye of the holder, we suppose.

Nixon pointed out that as long as you only bought American goods, this would not be a big deal at all – your purchasing power would stay exactly the same.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I guess somewhere between Honda, Toyota, Hyundai, and Volkswagen cars, Samsung televisions, LG appliances, textiles, home goods, and chopsticks, Americans have been buying billions in foreign goods, leaving the United States with a trade balance that has never been equalized. Nixon loses some futurist points right there.

The economic prosperity of the United States has been more than enough to equal the loss of purchasing power of the dollar, correct?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actually, it seems more that household debt, both as credit cards and student loan debt, have been making up the losses since the unshackling of the U.S. dollar from the Bretton Woods agreement.

Whether you take these trends to be correlation or causation, the last forty years of economics have been an experiment with a new international financial regime. Almost every currency on Earth is run by diktat, which means “it’s worth what we say it’s worth.” The world’s economic system becomes ever more complex as new countries trade in earnest, but there is no longer a limiting factor, i.e. the limited availability of reserve goal, to which to tether the system. The world system now requires a group of like-minded global financial engineers to keep fiscal infrastructure running through policies that beg and pray for status quo stability, rather than a group of reasonably unbiased referees who set a few rules and let the game play out as it may. This is where the intellectual work of Nassim Nicholas Taleb comes into play, posing the question, “Who could possibly possess the wisdom to manage a system of limitless complexity?” Answer: nobody we see in the public sphere today.

Returning to Nixon, he wanted to hamstring the “international financial speculators.” Today, megabanks, hedge funders, traders and George Soros-type financiers enjoy limitless access to Washington policy makers and even get made Treasury Secretary with significant frequency. Nixon wanted to end the crises that enriched financial engineers at the expense of real wealth creators. Hello double digit unemployment and simultaneous record-breaking financier bonus pools. He wanted to protect American purchasing power and promote American-made goods within her borders. We instead see never-ending trade deficits.

Where does monetary policy go from here? If you ask gold bugs, it is right back to some form of gold standard. If you ask central banks, they will tell you we just need one more bailout of some sunburned nation that lost control of its finances, but then we’ll be back to “normal.” If you ask the average working person or job-creating entrepreneur, they will likely look at you blankly, uninterested in the machinations of ultra-high level policymaking.

In any event, the trend lines suggest the end of an era. Step back hundreds of years, and there are no global systems of fiat currency to give us an instructive analogy. We will be creating our future anew.

What do you think? Is it back to precious metals with us? Will the system shatter into competing local currencies? Facebook credits? Giant stone wheels of the Yapman? Leave us your view in the comments section.

Applying Scenario, Wargames and Advanced Intelligence Analytics (Part Two)

Monday, 25 July 2011 09:23 Written by Eric Garland 0 Comments

This is part two of our dialogue with Aurora WDC on how executives should be approaching scenarios, wargames and other sophisticated tools to decode the rapidly changing market.

An important facet covered here is the dynamic between using facilitators from within the organization versus working with trusted outsiders to provide intelligence and analysis.

 

How to apply scenarios, wargames, and advanced analytics to your strategy

Sunday, 10 July 2011 13:11 Written by Eric Garland 0 Comments

This dialogue with Arik Johnson, Derek Johnson, and Dr. Craig Fleisher details how executives can improve their foresight through more sophisticated analytical techniques than have been demanded in recent years.

 

Competition expert Clayton Christensen worries for the future of America

Thursday, 30 June 2011 11:48 Written by Eric Garland 0 Comments

America’s two reigning experts in competitive strategy, Clayton Christensen and Michael Porter have both come on record to state their worry about the lack of competitive position in the United States.

In this thoughtful video, Christensen talks about the connection between overly-strict immigration policies and the future of innovation in America. The United States, in its zeal to restrict foreign access to America for national security, is also repelling the entrepreneurs who would create new jobs.

Alison Wolf: Education does NOT equal economic growth

Wednesday, 29 June 2011 13:51 Written by Eric Garland 0 Comments

Further to our research on the end of the education bubble, we recommend this detailed interview with Professor Alison Wolf, author of Does Education Matter? Myths About Education and Economic Growth. She goes headlong against the orthodoxy of educational institutions, challenging the “great secular faith of our age” that increasing the number of people with educational credentials actually increases economic growth.

This line of inquiry flies in the face of every political speech of the last fifty years and rips to shreds many of the “knowledge worker/creative class” strategies of recent economic development ideas. This is an interesting polemic that accompanies the structural trend analysis that shows how much debt we are incurring to continue a broken system.

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »

About the blog

This is the official trend blog of Competitive Futures, a management consultancy that provides trend research and analysis for business and government around the world. Here, we update you on interesting trends we see as part of our work for our clients.


For managing partner Eric Garland's new author and speaker blog, please consult and bookmark http://www.ericgarland.co

Get trend updates sent to your mailbox

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Sign up for the CompFutures Trend Report

Trends we’re tracking

Tags

agriculture analysis bailout bailouts banking banks business development business models California China competitive intelligence debt disruption Economic Development Economics economy education Energy Entrepreneurialism Facebook finance financial crisis forecasting forecasts foresight future Futurism Greece healthcare intelligence leadership Media mergers mindsets music oil petroleum psychology publishing Retail scenarios social media social networks strategy urbanization
Podcast powered by podPress v8.8.10.12