• Home
  • About
    • About Competitive Futures
    • About Eric Garland
    • News
  • Case studies
    • Competitive strategy
    • Economic development
    • Opportunity assessment
  • Services
    • Research
      • Technology foresight
      • Future customer profiles
      • Competitor positioning
      • Investment due diligence
    • Training
      • Future Intelligence course
      • Real Forecasting
  • Media
    • Best practice reports
    • Books by Eric Garland
    • Articles by Eric Garland
    • Podcast episodes
    • STEEP Reports
    • Presentations
  • Blog
  • Contact

Archive for June, 2009

People change – how our robust savings rate shows the genius of systems thinking

Monday, 29 June 2009 11:01 Written by Eric Garland 0 Comments

The basic idea behind futures analysis is that 1) our whole society is connected in a system 2) trends act on the system 3) people piggy-bank-on-money-md1act differently due to these changes. This is a more revolutionary concept that you would think; it is met with considerable skepticism. Our culture actively supports the notion that nothing is really systemic, because otherwise it would require complex thinking to understand it, and thus wouldn’t be easily salable to the masses. This is one explanation why our major media rarely approach topics from a systems perspective – they prefer an atomistic approach that prefers celebrities and disjointed headlines to connections.

Regardless, after twelve or so years of this work, I remain steadily convinced that the basic methodology of systems thinking is the way to go if you want to understand what’s next. Because – as stupidly simple as it sounds – people really do change in response to stimuli, as they always have. Take for example our new Asian-style savings rate in the United States – 6.9%, up from 0% in April of 2008. That’s not an incremental change in consumer behavior, it’s a complete revolution in a little more than a year. This is an example of reality outpacing fiction, for if you suggested that the American consumer would on average go from spending like a pack of feral teens on methamphetamine at the mall, mortgaging their children’s future for big screen TVs, to spending nothing and stuffing money in their mattress like a wary old shopkeeper in Hong Kong in just 14 months…well, you had better be pretty convincing to get people to buy it. How did people change so radically in such a short period of time?

Well, the answer couldn’t be simpler. All you need do is scare the bejeezus out of the Boomers, who are facing a structurally uncertain retirement, and BANG, people figure out quickly that your house may be a financial boondoggle, but people still love cold hard CASH. Unsurprisingly, savings accounts begin filling up in ways they haven’t since the World War II generation was at the height if its economic power.

The common myth in America had been such that the Greatest Generation saved cash for a rainy day for the same reasons they beat the Nazis – they were just fantastic, noble, foresighted, brilliant citizens living in a finer age. Of course, this is complete nonsense. The Generation born between 1915 and 1930 was just as venal, dishonest, credulous, and short-sighted as the next batch of humans. Why did they save money where we went nuts at the TV store? There were three main reasons. First, there wasn’t nearly the amount of liquid credit available in the national banking system. Second, many shops did not take credit. And most importantly, they lived through the Depression, when all national governance failed to stop Americans from starving. Basically, they didn’t believe, as many do today, that everything would turn out okay. They knew that complex systems often failed, and many of them literally lost their farms as a result.

Why did Americans start saving all of the sudden? Was it the spirits of their long dead ancestors returned to waggle their fingers in disgust until they were shamed into a 6.9% savings rate? I can’t rule that out, but more importantly credit dried up and people got scared to death. First, credit lines were tightened up, and then people figured out that bad stuff could definitely happen. In other words, two of the systemic requirements for a high national savings rate. The system changed, and then the people responded to the stimuli. Magic.

Question for the week – what are the key parts of your business’s system that could change, and what might it mean for you. If people can start saving 7% on a moment’s notice, they can change in other ways, too.

Baby no cry (or, the disassociative fugue of the Crisis)

Thursday, 25 June 2009 16:30 Written by Eric Garland 2 Comments

Back a few decades ago, when in graduate school, my son, then maybe two years old, was playing outside in a common area. He fell and hit his head pretty hard. A Japanese women, wife of a grad student, saw it and said, managing as best she could with limited English: “Baby hit head, if cry, no problem. Baby hit head, no cry. Problem.”

I would say, about the current reactions to the economic scene, that the baby is not crying.

time_confusionI read this comment this past week over at Gregor MacDonald’s fantastically insightful blog and it really stuck with me. So much news keeps coming at us, so many  headlines informing us of additional $60 billion obligations to our future earnings and yet people seem to be in a daze, tuning out additional rotten information.

An example: I was just in Europe working with clients on economic forecasts and scenarios, typical futurist stuff. A couple of times I was asked a most unusual question. “So, do you think the crisis is really still going on over in America?”

I asked, “Did you see that General Motors, one of the most venerated companies in the history of American capitalism went bankrupt last week?” The quick reply, “Sure.”

Me: “Well, that’s gonna sting a little.”

Them: “So, you think that’s bad.”

Me: “The bankruptcy of GM and the impending meltdown of California and stuff? Yes, that’s pretty gnarly.”

Them: “Oh…I guess…I guess that’s true.” *silence*

People, at what point did the destruction of America’s top car manufacturer become easily forgettable? Are we just so overstimulated by bad news that we’ve stopped thinking about the consequences?

Five years ago, if you had suggested a scenario that by 2010 unemployment would be at 11% and General Motors would be nationalized, your colleagues would immediately seize you and force feed you antidepressants and romantic comedies until your hyper-gloominess passed. Today, it barely provokes a response.

Are we in a fog or what? And what will it take to get us thinking again?


Dutch futurists look at “Enkhuizen 2030″

Thursday, 11 June 2009 10:46 Written by Eric Garland 2 Comments

I just caught wind of some futures studies going on in the Netherlands, examining the twenty year future of some of their towns. I especially liked this video, showing three distinct futures for the town through animation. This is a very compelling way of actually showing people what you mean when you discuss abstract trends as well as potential policy responses. At the end of the day, futures studies are about showing decision makers and stakeholders the possibilities, empowering people, far more than “predicting” the future.

How can you make your ideas more attractive? How can you make a compelling case for change? Think of different ways to tell your story.

The 2012 Pelosi GTxi SS/RT Sport Edition – Strategic Scenarios in a Time of Political Intervention

Wednesday, 10 June 2009 09:14 Written by Eric Garland 1 Comment

If you have a certain nostalgia for 1980s Soviet advertising, or if you’re interested in the current state of the semi-nationalized automobile industry, you’ll get a chuckle out of this “scenario,” an ad for the 2012 Pelosi GTxi SS/RT Sport.

It’s funny, and yes, it contains some fairly partisan political jabs. That kind of material is something I would studiously avoid in a professional context – especially this blog. That said, we’re not in ordinary times. I would say that the current level of government involvement now means that political analysis of industry developments is more important than ever.

As I have said previously, the government is no longer simply regulating industry or financing it through monetary policy – it is now managing companies with the taxpayers as stockholders who have a right to see their investments protected. This will necessarily require an analysis of politicians and their goals. This may mean our competitive analyses will lay bare political feelings in our own organizations. That was the risk of the U.S. Government’s bailout policies, a dramatically-increased politicization of the American – and global – business environment. And here we are.

Mike Shedlock (“Mish”) on starting your own blogging business, the Fed, Google, and everything

Monday, 08 June 2009 15:42 Written by Eric Garland 0 Comments

Do you read Mish’s Global Economics Trend Analysis blog? If clarity is a virtue, Mike Shedlock is a saint. Every day he is delving into some key economic statistic that will light up the future for you. He’s ahead of the curve. He IS the curve. He doesn’t need curves. He’s the Chuck Norris of economic thinking.

He has one of the top economics blogs in the world – but he’s not an economist by training. He started his interest in global economics as a result of being unemployed, and went from there. In every way he started his intellectual empire from the ground up. He is the kind of expert we need most.

Mish has a great story and a brilliant mind. Check out his most recent talk at Google, and FOLLOW THIS GUY.

« Older Entries

About the blog

This is the official trend blog of Competitive Futures, a management consultancy that provides trend research and analysis for business and government around the world. Here, we update you on interesting trends we see as part of our work for our clients.


For managing partner Eric Garland's new author and speaker blog, please consult and bookmark http://www.ericgarland.co

Get trend updates sent to your mailbox

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Sign up for the CompFutures Trend Report

Trends we’re tracking

Tags

agriculture analysis bailout bailouts banking banks business development business models California China competitive intelligence debt disruption Economic Development Economics economy education Energy Entrepreneurialism Facebook finance financial crisis forecasting forecasts foresight future Futurism Greece healthcare intelligence leadership Media mergers mindsets music oil petroleum psychology publishing Retail scenarios social media social networks strategy urbanization
Podcast powered by podPress v8.8.10.12